The MP for Newport East, Jessica Morden, has affirmed the government’s commitment to addressing concerns about online platforms and protecting children under sixteen.
The parliamentarian joined fellow representatives from Gwent in backing the Amendments to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill motion.
The legislation dealing with Lords Amendments 38V–38X from April 2026 has entered a crucial parliamentary ping-pong stage, with the Commons deciding to preserve stronger powers and overturn the Lords’ attempts to restrict them.
These specific amendments concern internet safety, intended to allow the Secretary of State to force internet service providers to prevent harmful content from reaching children without being bound by existing consultations or the cautious constraints proposed by the Lords.
The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill aims to increase educational participation in coordinated safeguarding systems to better protect young people from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Its goals involve creating a support structure to raise standards throughout education and care settings, ensuring every child can thrive and develop. It seeks to stop vulnerable young people from falling through gaps in services while maintaining essential quality standards and allowing flexibility in each child’s educational journey.
Morden expressed that many voters had contacted her about internet safety for under-sixteens, particularly regarding social media platforms. She stated that last night’s vote demonstrates the government’s determination to address these concerns. She added that any future restrictions will be based on the government’s ongoing consultation, and she would encourage residents of Newport East to get involved and voice their opinions.
Most Liberal Democrat MPs voted against the amendments. They described the Conservative-supported amendment as a political football and considered the government’s alternative approach too slow.
Speaking in the House of Lords, Liberal Democrat Education spokesperson Lord Mohamed of Tinsley said that they are not fundamentally divided and all want the same results. He suggested that they should meet together at one time in a single place and try to sort things out, noting that people out there are waiting for their response.